Reconstruction talk:Proto-Celtic/ɸrikā

Final letter
, I just realised Matasovic attached an implosive to the end of this, "ɸrikƒ". In our notation, is that macron a? UtherPendrogn (talk) 19:07, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't know what version you're looking at, but in my print edition it says "frikā" with a long a. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 19:15, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Mine says "frikƒ". I can move the page myself, you know. Thanks for doing it, though. UtherPendrogn (talk) 19:18, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I suspect (Pre-Primitive Irish?) *enterriky was supposed to be *enterrikā, but really, it looks more like etarche should go back to something like *anter-ɸrik-yo-m.
 * Also, Proto-Brythonic cannot go back to *ɸrikā; the expected outcome would have been **rex rather than *rɨx. Proto-Brythonic can only go back to something like *ɸrik(o)-; in view of the Proto-Germanic consonant-stem root noun *furh- it was likely a consonant-stem root noun itself. In fact, Romance borrowings like Catalan (rather than **rega) are incompatible with the reconstruction *ɸrikā, too (the cognates listed in  reinforce that the Proto-Indo-European reconstruction should be *pr̥ḱ- rather than *pr̥ḱeh₂; a collective form may well account for the *-eh₂ sometimes found). So the article should be moved to  or . --Florian Blaschke (talk) 04:15, 12 June 2019 (UTC)