Reconstruction talk:Proto-Germanic/bausahaiduz

RFD discussion: January 2023
Two modern West-Germanic words (three if you count also Dutch boosheid, attested from the Middle Dutch period and not listed on the entry) do not justify a Proto-Germanic reconstruction it seems, given that a later date explains these modern compounds just fine. A Proto-West Germanic reconstruction entry may be justifiable to some degree, so moving the entry is also a possibility (although I for one doubt this existed in PWGmc). — Mnemosientje (t · c) 14:53, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Not a good PG entry, but it makes for a solid PWG one. I've moved it to Reconstruction:Proto-West Germanic/bausihaidu. -- Skiulinamo (talk) 18:07, 24 January 2023 (UTC)