Reconstruction talk:Proto-Germanic/brumþiz

*brunstiz
lists for Dutch, also Gothic and OHG. She reconstructs instead. —CodeCat 18:51, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * German has both and, both more or less meaning the same thing. The first is from , the second is related to Old Norse , which is identical to the situation of  and , Old Norse continuing the Verner's alternate. Old Norse also shows  (neuter) for  and  <  vs  > OHG . Anglom (talk) 19:52, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

*brunþiz
Shouldn't "m" before a dental consonant become "n". Moreover, there is 🇨🇬 in Koebler dictionary and none of the listed descendants have "m". 𐌷𐌻𐌿𐌳𐌰𐍅𐌹𐌲𐍃 𐌰𐌻𐌰𐍂𐌴𐌹𐌺𐌹𐌲𐌲𐍃 (talk) 17:17, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * The combination mþ seems to have remained in, because it's directly attested in Gothic and the labial is preserved in High German and Dutch as well. If there is indeed a regular change mþ > nþ, then this may have been an analogical restoration on the model of , but then I think the restoration had to have happened in Pre-Germanic times. —Rua (mew) 18:14, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Also, note that does in fact have, it's just spelled with an n. The same happens in modern German  < . —Rua (mew) 18:15, 14 February 2020 (UTC)