Reconstruction talk:Proto-Germanic/laują

RFV discussion: February–November 2020
Evidence? None of the descendants would ever point to a neuter noun. Also, it is impossible for 🇨🇬 to give 🇨🇬. 𐌷𐌻𐌿𐌳𐌰𐍅𐌹𐌲𐍃 𐌰𐌻𐌰𐍂𐌴𐌹𐌺𐌹𐌲𐌲𐍃 (talk) 05:32, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, our etymologies for the Germanic terms for 'lion' are truly all over the place. The Gothic term was attested 7 years ago as, btw, which is what I moved the entry to. And I have removed it from that PGmc entry, as indeed it cannot possibly have yielded any such Gothic form. The PGmc should probably be deleted. Even the MHG is not neuter, it's a masculine weak noun. I think the creator misinterpreted an etymology mentioning "*laujan-" as a neuter a-stem instead of a masculine an-stem, I have no idea how else one would get to a neuter a-stem from these supposed descendants. — Mnemosientje (t · c) 11:43, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * The WG forms appear to point to PG, which would be consistent with the Gothic. See on Latin . --  19:47, 3 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Moved to Reconstruction:Proto-West Germanic/lēwō by . — justin(r)leung { (t...) 17:07, 2 November 2020 (UTC)