Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-Aryan/źʰansás

RFD discussion: February–April 2021
Is this actually needed? I don't find any useful on these 2 - they appear just to be showing the Sanskrit descendant, the meaning and the PII word. I've fixed Special:WhatLinksHere/Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-Aryan/źʰansás and Special:WhatLinksHere/Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-Aryan/dáźʰati. 🔥 शब्दशोधक 🔥 17:00, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * User:Bhagadatta 🔥 शब्दशोधक 🔥 13:29, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not just this but many other PIA entries here which are unsourced need to go. They only have one descendant - Sanskrit- which you might as well show on the PII page. I there should be sources mentioning PIA terms (eg Lubotsky, Goto, Kobayashi) or you have to have Mittani borrowings to make a PIA entry worthwhile. So these PIA lemmas which are "Wiktionary reconstructed" with no sources need to go. -- 𝓑𝓱𝓪𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓽𝓽𝓪(𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴) 13:42, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
 * What has to be done? You may give your vote. Thanks. 🔥 शब्दशोधक 🔥 07:06, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I already voted delete. -- 𝓑𝓱𝓪𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓽𝓽𝓪(𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴) 11:35, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Allahverdi Verdizade (talk) 08:47, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I see no reason to delete a reconstruction with two descendants. Keep Thadh (talk) 23:28, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * It's actually just one descendant, since Kashmiri is itself a descendant of Sanskrit. 🔥 शब्दशोधक 🔥 07:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh, right, whoops... I've striked my vote and I believe deletion is okay in that case. Thadh (talk) 11:09, 6 March 2021 (UTC)


 * ❌ (tagged for speedy deletion, in reality) - clear consensus to delete these two. 🔥 शब्दशोधक 🔥 16:29, 8 April 2021 (UTC)