Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/ǵʰórtos

Descendants from both *ǵʰortos, *ǵʰordʰos and *ǵʰr̥dʰos are conflated in this list. I suggest a neutral name for the page *ǵʰ(o)rCos instead of splitting. It makes sense to treat them together because likely there was a single form, but the participle of *ǵʰer- and/or perhaps pronunciation of the original root noun *ǵʰordʰs have caused mixing in the daughters. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 04:05, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Pitch

 * why isn't it ? --Barytonesis (talk) 13:35, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Probably because of the idea that Germanic comes from it. —Rua (mew) 13:36, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Except Germanic can equally be derived from, and in fact that's what Kroonen says and this is why it's listed under that root now, not here, so there is no reason anymore for the final accent. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 17:49, 19 May 2018 (UTC)