Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/ḱweyt-

PII *ĉ > PIr *ĉ no? 2405:204:939C:1962:0:0:2420:50A5 01:49, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * User:Victar/Wiktionary:About_Proto-Iranian. — JohnC5 03:46, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Umm thats exactly what victar's table says, PIE ḱ to PII ĉ to PIr ĉ. Why have you changed Proto-Iranian ĉpaytah to spaytah? 2405:204:939C:1962:0:0:2420:50A5 08:43, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Look at the consonant clusters section. — JohnC5 14:51, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Non-palatal version?
Do any other branches (IIr.?) show reflexes of a plain, non-palatal *k?

The variation in Balto-Slavic seems kind of crazy ...then again with akmuo / ašmuo maybe it's not such a big deal? Neitrāls vārds (talk) 00:45, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * According to Derksen, *ḱ de-palatalized in pre-PBS before *w and a back vowel (*ḱ > *k /_wV[+back]). 🤷‍♂️ -- 23:34, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

d-extension candidates
Forms from 🇨🇬, sometimes associated with within the literature (not universally accepted):
 * Balto-Slavic:
 * , 1p. pres. svîdu
 * Germanic:
 * Indo-Iranian:
 * Indo-Iranian:
 * Indo-Iranian:
 * Indo-Iranian: