Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/bʰewd-

Delete. No enough evidence, indeed. However, look again the root in LIV. I don't have the slightest clue where you came up with conclusion that the root there is "completely different"? Just another of your "totally ..." observations that are obvious only to you and you alone. Bezimenen (talk) 08:57, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

RFD discussion: October 2019–March 2020
With only the PG, this entry should be deleted. -- 21:17, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I've added some more potential descendants from this root. —Mahāgaja · talk 13:45, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Those "descendants" are so iffy they belong in the etymology, not a full entry. -- 17:52, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * PC is much more likely to be from PIE  and Latin  on connected to the PG on the basis of  but that can only be cognate with the Germanic if we  assume a  root. --  00:46, 26 October 2019 (UTC)


 * RFD-deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:04, 23 March 2020 (UTC)