Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/gʷʰedʰ-

Germanic *bidjaną
I do not think that Germanic:  and the cognates belong here. See its talk page why not. Zezen (talk) 12:38, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

And see also Appendix:Proto-Germanic/bīdanąZezen (talk) 12:47, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I think is far more likely to be from  than from  for semantic reasons. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 16:45, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Do you think that Appendix:Proto-Germanic/bīdaną is related thereto then as per bidan etc? If so, appart from the different meanings, why the different proposed etymologies? We need to standardize one way or the other. Zezen (talk) 20:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The ablaut pattern of the Germanic verb unambigiously points to PIE ey-oy-i. —CodeCat 20:56, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * No, I don't think is related to . —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 21:46, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

All of bidjan%C4%85 need to be fixed then. Good night. Zezen (talk) 00:03, 30 January 2016 (UTC)