Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/h₁óynos

Pronomial stem
The entry references the "pronomial stem". However, the English is said to come from. I think this suggests that the Proto-Indo-European phonemes and  were realized as a velar plosive and a velar fricative, respectively. Jackwolfroven (talk) 21:26, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Not at all. They were two different stems and both are found varyingly in Germanic and other Indo-European languages. The primary meaning of the former was an anaphoric pronoun that referred to something previously mentioned, and this included use as a pronoun. The other referred specifically to things close by, and it is also the basis of the word . Gothic has but also, and German  is from  too. The Slavic languages also preserve both stems.  21:56, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I think I was confused when I wrote the above; apologies. I do have a question about that possible etymology, though: how do non-verbal stems such as this work in PIE grammar? Can they function as verbal stems? Jackwolfroven (talk) 01:45, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I think your question kind of contradicts itself. If they're non-verbal stems, doesn't that mean they don't function as verbal stems by definition? 11:34, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Romanian
Does Romanian unu really descend from Umbrian, as depicted on the entry page ? Leasnam (talk) 11:10, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * No. Regular derivation from Latin unus.--Manfariel (talk) 23:35, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

οἶνος
The entry to which the link leads has the meaning "wine", not "ace".--Manfariel (talk) 18:35, 6 July 2020 (UTC)