Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/h₁a h₁a

RFD discussion: October 2022
Proto-Indo-European. I don't see a point reconstructing this type of percussive elements (not to mention the fact that the reconstruction is almost certainly wrong, in its current form at least). Nonverbal elements don't obey to sound laws, so there's no reason to apply the comparative method to them. as the editors. Thadh (talk) 10:34, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete with extreme prejudice. What's next, reconstructing *ssss as Proto-Snake? Chuck Entz (talk) 11:30, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * LMFAO. Yeah, this is a nonsense entry. Delete. --Skiulinamo (talk) 22:43, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @Chuck Entz If you like, you can even ban me for it. ZomBear (talk) 23:59, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Seasons have changed and the offence appears to have attained prescription. Fay Freak (talk) 00:55, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vininn126 (talk) 11:53, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Or maybe changed it back to "ha ha"? --I am a Green Bee (talk) 19:49, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Both are wrong. --Skiulinamo (talk) 22:43, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I don’t know what it is imitative of. Probably a wanderwort. Delete. Fay Freak (talk) 23:17, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The descendants section summarizes my reaction.
 * Delete, along with the Proto-Slavic entries. Nicodene (talk) 23:20, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Hey, I totally believe they existed in Proto-Slavic. Even if the modern Slavic forms are not inherited but formed anew, this very circumstance is proof of the same phenomenon in the past (there are not few cases where it is actually irrelevant if purported descendants are actually inherited or reinvented as in either case the proto-form is induced). We don’t know enough how it looked in Proto-Indo European though. Fay Freak (talk) 00:55, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, correct entry should be remade under *gʰh₂éɡʰeh₂s as evidenced by Latin /s. Catonif (talk) 11:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC)