Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/leykʷ-

Unsorted formations: Balto-Slavic: Lithuanian: likti ‎(“stay”), atlaikas ‎(“remains”) etc. should be merged with the above: duplication. I am not sure how, however. Zezen (talk) 21:39, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Thematic root aorist
,, can you have a look at the thematic root aorist section? I am not very familiar with our presentation system yet. In particular, should the augment be included in the headword? --Vahag (talk) 13:59, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The augment was not a part of the verb in PIE. In fact, it didn't get added to the aorist until the aorist acquired past-tense semantics, which it didn't have in PIE. Homeric Greek still had an optional augment, so we can't say the augment was already present in PIE. —CodeCat 14:34, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * So how do we present it?, ? --Vahag (talk) 17:44, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The former. Though I must say that reconstructable thematic aorists are quite rare. —CodeCat 18:34, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, I can't think of many thematic aorists off the top of my head. — JohnC5 21:42, 29 January 2017 (UTC)