Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/pléh₃tus

RFV discussion: December 2020–February 2021
Based only on Germanic? —Rua (mew) 17:28, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Does seem fishy. What would be the alternative explanation for the PGmc? Simply +, which appears to have a variant *-duz? — Mnemosientje (t · c) 18:03, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes. It's made from the same pieces, but there's not enough evidence that the combination was already in use in PIE. It would have been made in the intervening time from PIE to PG. —Rua (mew) 18:16, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree then that the PIE should be deleted. A related question on my mind is the productivity of, it, and , are often said to not have been productive in Germanic anymore, but on what basis? Something like might even indicate productivity in Gothic. — Mnemosientje (t · c) 11:25, 5 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Sorry baby . Delete. -- 06:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * @Victar: Oh definitely. No idea why I thought this was a good idea. —*i̯óh₁n̥C[5] 06:44, 6 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Should've been at RFD, but based on this discussion, RFD-deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:43, 1 February 2021 (UTC)