Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/wérsēn

Reconstruction
Hi. Compare with. In Proto-Nakh, it is reconstructed as follows. In Proto-Lezghian, the semantics are: man, husband. Should we add this reconstruction? Gnosandes (talk) 23:17, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
 * What's your source? Also, why are you reconstructing Proto-Avaro-Andian with no descendants? -- 19:15, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * We have only one reconstruction. Where did I reconstruct without descendants? Gnosandes (talk) 22:15, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I'll clarify my questions. What is the source for PNC being a borrowing, and particularly from PII, and the reconstruction itself? Why did you reconstruct Proto-Avaro-Andian with no descendants listed in the Descendants tree? -- 23:20, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I see it was *wĕršē and I've added the needed source. -- 01:08, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

*h₂wers-
do we mean Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/h₁wers-? if the reconstructions dont line up, this is a problem, because i doubt we could have two such roots in PIE. — Soap — 09:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes, if you see RC:Proto-Indo-European/h₁wers-, is an alternative reconstruction. --  01:50, 1 June 2024 (UTC)