Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/werǵ-

I just noticed there is a page where for *werǵ- given descendant OCS vragu. Is it probable? — Игорь Телкачь 15:44, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * That Slavic word is listed in Appendix:Proto-Indo-European/wérǵom. I don't know if it is correct. --Vahag (talk) 17:25, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * According to Derksen (527) PIE word for is . Also i noticed that PIE ǵ (can) give z in Slavic (e.g. *zьrno; при и.-е. *rēǵ- ожидалось бы слав. *rězъ). Here is Deksen etymology for some words (i replaced Germanic descendants by PG):
 * PS from PIE . Cognate with PG . See also:.
 * PS from . Cognate with PG . See also:.
 * If there is PS *vьršiti and it comes from *vьrxъ then:
 * PS from PIE.
 * Looks like only is suitable for . — Игорь Телкачь  19:40, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Ваш английский не очень понятен. Если Вы не против, перейдём на русский. Я удалил добавленные безродным IP славянские рефлексы *wérǵom. Правильно ли я понимаю, что по Дерксену вершить и иже с ним не происходят из *wérǵom в любом случае? --Vahag (talk) 20:11, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Я не старался разжёвывать. Вы верно убрали неподходящие слова в статье . — Игорь Телкачь 12:15, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

The page says it comes from non-ablauting Appendix:Proto-Indo-European/wérǵom. Anyone know it got -o- instead of -e-? 04:32, 06 September 2018 (UTC)
 * See Martirosyan 2010, page 227, for an explanation. --Vahag (talk) 09:17, 4 December 2018 (UTC)