Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/wr̥h₁ḗn

RFD discussion: March–June 2019
I didn't understand why this was candidate for deletion... its not a term invented, it appears in "The Oxford Introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European World (Mallory & Adams)" ISBN-13: 978-0199296682, page 135

I added it's declension and some derivates... --Lucumur (talk) 10:55, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I tagged this for speedy deletion because it was unsourced. Thoughts? Per utramque cavernam 11:11, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Yep, it's both poorly made and lacks and sources. The user should have a look at other PIE entries and try and mimic those before creating more. -- 14:57, 16 March 2019 (UTC)


 * i know its a stub, but this has references and its valid. a lot of wiktionary entries are sourceless and nobody is adding deletion templates.... I will add my reference and you can investigate about the topic. I added tags also to the page.... --Lucumur (talk) 23:10, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

there are a lot of people who tries to add a little of something to wiki, for contribution purposes, not the ego of being an "editor" but full-time wikipedists make hard this job... you can add a template, hey buddy, you need some sources... you need some style. no.... "delete", particularly if its a new page...sorry but this makes me feel a little angry --Lucumur (talk) 23:19, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I understand your frustration, and I apologise for the way I've treated your contribution. I've replaced the request for deletion with a request for cleanup. For a variety of reasons, Wiktionary can seem very harsh to newcomers, but please don't be discouraged. chignon – bun – пучок 00:05, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

I've cleaned up the entry a bit, and removed descendants which were clearly not descendants but rather descendants of some derived term. —Rua (mew) 18:12, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
 * RFD-resolved &mdash; surjection &lang;?&rang; 13:29, 10 June 2019 (UTC)