Reconstruction talk:Proto-Italic/tenwis

RFD discussion: September 2023
This qualifies for deletion under the above-mentioned "only one descendant" criterion. Furthermore, our entry cites an entry by De Vaan that actually contradicts it: what De Vaan actually reconstructs for Proto-Italic is *tn̥(a)u-, an u-stem adjective, saying "The PIt. u-stem adj. was remade into an i-stem". Urszag (talk) 08:06, 11 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Speedied, already failed RFD. Catonif (talk) 09:59, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, I actually disagree vehemently with strictly following the "only one descendant" criterion (I see value in one-descendant entries on certain occasions), but this entry is just plain incorrect and worthless even under my views. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 14:41, 12 September 2023 (UTC)