Reconstruction talk:Proto-Japonic/e-ku

was originally not a single word. It's a compound of +, and  itself is akin of. To lemmatize as this form is not good.--荒巻モロゾフ (talk) 12:28, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * , ditto what said.  Compounds are poor choices for reconstructed lemmata.
 * Derivatives of include:
 * As you can probably see, this was a productive element in older times, and should thus be treated as its own lemma.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 23:20, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
 * As you can probably see, this was a productive element in older times, and should thus be treated as its own lemma.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 23:20, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
 * As you can probably see, this was a productive element in older times, and should thus be treated as its own lemma.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 23:20, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
 * As you can probably see, this was a productive element in older times, and should thus be treated as its own lemma.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 23:20, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
 * As you can probably see, this was a productive element in older times, and should thus be treated as its own lemma.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 23:20, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
 * As you can probably see, this was a productive element in older times, and should thus be treated as its own lemma.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 23:20, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
 * As you can probably see, this was a productive element in older times, and should thus be treated as its own lemma.  ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 23:20, 3 June 2019 (UTC)