Reconstruction talk:Proto-Korean/yoLa

Possible cognate
Considering especially the modern Korean form, I am reminded of the Old Japanese term , archaic modern Japanese term , where the final -du in the Old Japanese is likely a voiced version of the generic "number of things" numeral nominalizing suffix. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 21:45, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , I'm not really qualified to speak on the Japanese side of things (unlike you haha :D), but Vovin thought was a loan into Japanese from Korean (Koreo-Japonica, p. 218).--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 00:09, 4 November 2020 (UTC)