Reconstruction talk:Proto-Sino-Tibetan/pʷak

Compare English pig, pork... Wyang (talk) 01:44, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

The page says that Proto-Sino-Tibetan is *prwag and that *pʷak is Proto-Tibeto-Burman, so shouldn't this page be at Appendix:Proto-Sino-Tibetan/prwag? —Angr 07:56, 22 February 2013 (UTC)


 * References which have reconstructed PST are few and not up to date (including the Coblin 1986 here). I am trying to use (Matisoff, STEDT) consistently as PST proto-forms. Although Matisoff nominally treated his database reconstructions as being at the PTB level (perhaps), he definitely relied on the Chinese comparandae when reconstructing them (for example ). Comparing Chinese with TB is quite disorderly yet; waiting for a more authoritative source to be published is probably better. Wyang (talk) 11:39, 22 February 2013 (UTC)