Reconstruction talk:Proto-Slavic/dupl̥ce

l̥
Take a look at this word, what do you think about it? ɶLerman (talk) 07:08, 5 September 2023 (UTC)


 * @ɶLerman I think it needs to be renamed to . ZomBear (talk) 07:19, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Why? ɶLerman (talk) 14:02, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
 * @ɶLerman the only reason: it's because, I don't see here, that the use of, , is valid in entries for Proto-Slavic on Wiktionary. Or I'm wrong? ZomBear (talk) 14:25, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
 * OK, try changing it and we'll look at the behavior of the template. I hope you know what accent paradigm to use here. ɶLerman (talk) 14:38, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Wow, I liked that you found a book that had these wordforms in it :) ɶLerman (talk) 15:47, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
 * @ɶLerman чувак, прекращай подъёбывать) Yes I knew that you took them from the book Dybo (2000) when you created, , , , , . I am a kind of countryman V. Dybo... I was born 50 km from the place where he was born. ZomBear (talk) 16:14, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Hahaha, nice. Then you will need Template:R:sla:Dybo:1974‒1975. ɶLerman (talk) 16:18, 5 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The syllabization of -ьR/Rь- into -R̥- are post proto-Slavic developments. In Bulgarian, even the clusters -rǫ-, -lǫ- got syllabized within those dialects in which *ǫ > *ɤ (cf. 🇨🇬, < *gr̥da, *kl̥bo < 🇨🇬, ). On this account, it could be presumed that the aforementioned syllabization happened around late Antiquity at earliest, not within Proto-Slavic. 2A00:23C7:9C97:8201:2458:C7A4:6CCC:11C3 14:46, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I refuse to consider your system without accent systems. ɶLerman (talk) 15:01, 5 September 2023 (UTC)