Reconstruction talk:Proto-Slavic/prijati

Is the divergence in meaning of przyjąć to, which is morphologically a baseword for the latter, a secondary development? --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 13:55, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I doubt that is actually related to . Note different aspect.  seems to be, imperfective of  being, I think, . Compare , . (Also, I think the nasal vowel would not appear in Polish out of nowhere.) Keφr 14:24, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh I see. So this must be a mistake then, or defective orthography.. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 18:12, 6 November 2013 (UTC)


 * In Russian (and other East Slavic) also means "to accept", "to receive", an archaic form of, like Polish . --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 22:07, 6 November 2013 (UTC)


 * I guess the former… the definition they give looks a bit suspicious to me, and completely unrelated: . But still, these two are most probably… false friends. Keφr 08:38, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
 * False cognates, indeed. See also Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/yeh₂-
 * Zezen (talk) 07:50, 29 July 2021 (UTC)