Reconstruction talk:Proto-Slavic/vějati

The inflection should be like a simple thematic verb: e.g. the verbal noun should be, the L-participle , the aorist (2p, 3p) stem , etc. Unfortunately, I'm not familiar how to change it. Currently, the inflection table shows the forms of an a/V-theme verb.
 * PS: Apparently, Russian, Serbo-Croatian, and West Slavic demonstrate proper a/V-theme inflection. Bulgarian, Macedonian, Slovene, and OCS should be V-thematic, though. Bezimenen (talk) 13:09, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * or . But i don't see 1) What descendants show, , , 2) What OCS forms are V-thematic. —Игорь Тълкачь (talk) 19:43, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
 * : Modern Bulgarian and Macedonian forms (the expected a-theme inflection in these languages is 1p. **веям/веjaм; 2p. **веяш/веjаш, 3p. **вея/веjа or something of this sort) are such and have been so for a few centuries (most likely stretching to the time of Middle Church Slavonic). I should correct myself, though: the original L-participle and aorist (2p, 3p) are supposed to be, . The secondary epenthetic theme *-е- appears to be a semi-modern innovation. Also, the deverbal noun in Proto-Slavic probably was . The mentioned nьje-form would have been innovated at a later time. I was biased in my judgement, because my native language is Bulgarian. In Slovene, the infinitive form is to start with, so there is no dissent there.


 * Forms of in these languages do exist (e.g. the transgressive 🇨🇬 / 🇨🇬 [instead of **веjќи/вейки] or the deverbal 🇨🇬 [instead the expected **ветие]), however, I think they are innovated on the basis of . Similarly to  from pre-Slavic  or  from the attested . I guess the simplest solution is to give the Slovene and Bulgarian/Macedonian descendants in the page for  and to keep the remaining descendants here. As mentioned above, though, there is some overlapping between the two inflections. Bezimenen (talk) 10:10, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I've created entries for both Slovene verbs. is a normal -ati, -am verb in Slovene, so it doesn't seem to continue the Proto-Slavic paradigm. The accentuation (circumflex in all forms) is also indicative of a more recently derived verb, although it could be levelled from the present tense where the circumflex is regular in AP a verbs. —Rua (mew) 13:00, 22 June 2019 (UTC)