Reconstruction talk:Proto-Turkic/kȫĺek

botu
What of the Proto-Turkic version *botu ?
 * Does not have descendants. Only exists in Oghuz, Kipchak, and Karluk, we can not be sure if it is Proto-Turkic. It's a  word. You can reconstruct indicating that it is Common Turkic as in . BurakD53 (talk) 09:58, 14 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello again, sorry for the late response. The majority of linguists who have worked on the inscriptions of the Treasure of Nagyszentmiklós agree that the text is written in an early, possibly Oghur form of Turkic, and mentions a Butaul. However, they do not agree on whether the word is related to the Chuvash pyjt̬ă "louse" or a cognate of Common Turkic bota. Understandably this isn't the preferred hard evidence but it's food for thought nonetheless. Gibby01 (talk) 06:09, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Add your scientific reference and create the page botu then. But пыйтӑ is not synonymous with bota. They are bit, pişd and бит. BurakD53 (talk) 07:03, 27 January 2023 (UTC)