Reconstruction talk:Proto-West Germanic/faldistōl

if you want to delete this entry in favor of a PWG compound entry, I would say you need to create a solid PWG or  entry first. -- 19:27, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure that'll be necessary. It seems that does exist after all; note . Hazarasp (parlement · werkis) 02:02, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * "From earlier *field"? That form looks like it's from a zero-grade *fuldiz. -- 07:04, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * No, it can come from *faldiz; compare / ←, ← ,  ← . Where do you think the -ie- in  comes from? Hazarasp (parlement · werkis) 09:33, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Cool, so create a entry. And to answer your question, readjustments using existing related forms are very common. --  17:03, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I think you rather missed my point. is the regular reflex of  in some OE dialects, so no readjustment is necessary. Hazarasp (parlement · werkis) 23:15, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Really, because I think you missed mine, not to penis flex on you. My point is readjustment *is* possible, weather necessary or not. To discredit is outhand is foolhardy. -- 08:43, 7 August 2021 (UTC)