Reconstruction talk:Proto-West Germanic/rittjan

. This lemma already exist as, it seems to be related to. Any evidence this is supposed to be reconstructed without an initial h-? DerRudymeister (talk) 09:04, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * My starting point was the etymology of, which already connected it to - I simply filled in the gap. Etymology at  takes it further to PIE, so perhaps that ? Leasnam (talk) 00:09, 10 April 2022 (UTC)