Talk:évènemens


 * sorry to bother you again, but this looks wrong. is a recent spelling, while the spelling without t in the plural is archaic. Isn't it ? --Barytonesis (talk) 16:15, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Quite possibly, In which case it is wrong on the French Wiktionary - my French is not good enough to ask them. SemperBlotto (talk) 16:22, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I've tagged it for deletion there, we'll see. --Barytonesis (talk) 16:57, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * It has been deleted there (without discussion though). --Barytonesis (talk) 18:41, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * OK - deleted SemperBlotto (talk) 21:04, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I am not an experienced wiktionary editor, however numerous sources testify to both orthographies. While aigu-aigu is indeed the official late-19th century correct spelling, in the 18th and early 19th centuries the spelling was not hence fixed, and aigu-grave was (about?) as common as its modern counterpart. Then in 1990 the Académie accepted both spellings, hence the assumption that one is more modern than the other. But évènemens remains an attested archaic plural.