Talk:óltaʼ

Passive
Hi! Sorry for my hasty edit, but I still have to disagree. I agree that óltaʼ is an object-less form, but I'd say it's both object-less and passive. I made a page yesterday for ółtaʼ, which is object-less and active. I started to get a little confused, so here's a summary of my take on it: Ewweisser (talk) 20:28, 19 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Hello Ewweisser, thanks for the explanation, that makes sense and clears things up. I'd like to keep the etyl if that's all right with you, but otherwise I'm happy to fold in your previous changes (which I'll do in a moment).  -- Cheers, Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 02:36, 20 March 2012 (UTC)