Talk:ć

RFV discussion
Never seen this in any texts. May be yet another "invention" by Omniglot. -- Prince Kassad 19:12, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * What exactly is the problem? The letter exists at least in Polish and Croatian and apparently in Latin script of Serbian. Translingual appears bit weird to me. Can a letter which exists in only a small number of languages be Translingual? --Hekaheka 15:57, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Sure, why not? Mglovesfun (talk) 16:05, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Re: "What exactly is the problem?": note that the tag is in the ==Cimbrian== language section. So presumably, the problem is with the claim that this follows "c" and precedes "d" in the Cimbrian alphabet — or, more generally (judging by Prince Kassad's first comment here), with any claim that this letter is used in Cimbrian writing. —Ruakh TALK 17:08, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Not directly related to this RFV, but I don't see the value of having individual language sections for letters - that's precisely what Translingual is for. mul stands for multiple languages, when it's impractical to list them all. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:06, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't see the point in the translingual section; we can tell it's "The letter c with an acute accent." But knowing that it's used in Croatian and is pronounced /ʨ/, that's useful.--Prosfilaes 11:45, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * According to this source ć is the fifth letter of Cimbrian alphabet. --Hekaheka 10:35, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * And if you note, that's exactly the site that Kassad was questioning in the first post.--Prosfilaes 11:45, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

RFV failed, ==Cimbrian== section removed. —Ruakh TALK 04:10, 1 February 2011 (UTC)