Talk:čapmaq

Maybe title change to a reconstruction page??????? 2601:643:8101:64E1:45AD:715B:A5BE:BDD9 22:15, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

RFD discussion: October 2020
1. No sources 2. We don't lemmatize Old Turkic in Latin script. Allahverdi Verdizade (talk) 16:51, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * It's defined as a noun. Wouldn't maq be a verb ending like ?  Compare, which I assume is a cognate. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 20:32, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Turkic languages do have nouns on - maq, see irmaq, qarmaq. That's not the point though. This should be nuked on site. Allahverdi Verdizade (talk) 09:18, 28 October 2020 (UTC)