Talk:ĝermana vo

RFV discussion: March–July 2014
And the alternative form ĝermana vo, which Kwamikagami has made a redirect for some reason. Esperanto for double-u. There are lots of mentions on Usenet, but I can't find any uses. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 02:17, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The redirect was left behind when Kwamikagami erroneously moved to  in January, presumably mistaking it in good faith for a misspelling. I've moved it back and added a misspelling-of entry for the hard-g version. Left rfvs on both. ~ Röbin Liönheart (talk) 09:50, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm having more luck attesting the more convenient than either formal name  or . Seems like many speakers prefer two syllables to four. ~ Röbin Liönheart (talk) 00:35, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
 * germana vo failed, ĝermana vo passed. — Ungoliant (falai) 23:57, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Unstriking. All of the citations for ĝermana vo are mentions, not uses. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 01:52, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Fuck me! Failed. — Ungoliant (falai) 02:24, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Sigh. I was really hoping Mr. G would withdraw that nomination before it came to deleting a name of a letter of the alphabet. At least someone else stepped up to swing the axe. The CFI is a harsh mistress. ~ Röbin Liönheart (talk) 02:36, 11 July 2014 (UTC)