Talk:İzmir

RFV
I doubt this would be the main spelling in English. Relative usage? DCDuring TALK 22:58, 4 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Also, I don't see that most of the attributes of the encyclopedic definition are confirmed in the single citation. DCDuring TALK 23:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Swap content with Izmir. Dorem is pushing his pedantic agenda again. --Vahag 20:17, 8 January 2011 (UTC)


 * It's hardly my "pedantic agenda"; note that Wikipedia has its article at the dotted spelling. Good luck discovering relative usages when Google fails to distinguish the dotted and dotless undefined:s. For the point about "most of the attributes of the…definition [being un]confirmed in the single citation", see Talk:adolescentilism. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 19:04, 1 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Besides all that, it has been long established that we don't necessarily lemmatise the most common spelling of a word, but rather leave it up to the editor who creates the entry or section is question (see, for example, User talk:Doremítzwr: point 3 of my post timestamped 16:26, 13 April 2010). — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 17:55, 6 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Now tri-cited for good measure. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 14:21, 23 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Cited, and therefore passed: both this spelling and Izmir exist. Feel free to switch which of the two pages, this one and Izmir, is the main page, though. - -sche (discuss) 21:17, 10 August 2011 (UTC)