Talk:știință socială

Searching in Google:

Știință socială: 683.000 /// https://www.google.de/search?q=stiin%C8%9B%C4%83+social%C4%83&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=TXWKVrZDzKWyAcK8qogB

Științe sociale: 450.000 /// https://www.google.de/search?q=stiin%C8%9Be+sociale&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=XXSKVpWeOMuOsgH61pCAAQ

BAICAN XXX (talk) 12:59, 4 January 2016 (UTC)


 * I don't know how you use Google Baican, but here are the results from Romanian Google:


 * Științe sociale: 346.000 (source)
 * Știință socială: 6.890 (source)


 * Please read this article as well. --Robbie SWE (talk) 13:24, 4 January 2016 (UTC)


 * PS: even your source gives another number than the one you posted.DS

RFV discussion: January–July 2016
I moved this page because the most common form is in the plural, just like in other Romance languages. A Google search and the Romanian Wikipedia article on this subject support this renaming. However, the creator of the article, keeps reverting my edits and since I want to avoid a prolonged edit war, I want to raise the question here. --Robbie SWE (talk) 13:33, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * It does seem to be a matter of procedure rather than attestation. Just because something is usually in the plural doesn't mean we can't have the main entry at the singular. Renard Migrant (talk) 18:21, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I've added social by the way. Renard Migrant (talk) 10:08, 7 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Striking. As far as I can tell, no one is disputing the existence of the term, only the best way to organize the entries, so this is not an RFV issue. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 17:48, 1 July 2016 (UTC)