Talk:Τεφνέτ

Ῥα
Both extremely unlikely for the same reasons as above. Also suspicious to my eyes, but at least more plausible, are and. — Vorziblix (talk · contribs) 01:59, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
 * There's no reason to trust those any more, seeing as they're all by the same highly problematic anon, and they're no more difficult to verify, seeing that AGr. dictionaries should be essentially comprehensive, so I've added those two you mentioned to this RFV. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 16:38, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
 * RFV-failed &mdash; surjection &lang;?&rang; 18:12, 19 June 2019 (UTC)