Talk:Τισσαφέρνης


 * Hello. Could you one of you add the Old Persian etymon of this please?, , , , , and  are also waiting for their etyma, but this one is the most important I think. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 17:46, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The term is reconstructed on the basis of borrowings into other Near Eastern languages and a Middle Persian descendant, so the spelling is unattested. More info here. —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 20:20, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks. We do have a reconstructed spelling at, but the word is attested in an inflected form so I guess that's a different situation. I suppose we don't have enough here to reconstruct a spelling? If not, we should remove the term request with - (but we currently can't, because removes the transcription as well > ). --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 20:29, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * , could you have a look at the problem I described in my last message? --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 15:45, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
 * You mean the fact that  and ts don't play well together? —*i̯óh₁n̥C[5] 08:50, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, sorry for not being clear. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 09:01, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I sat down to do this, but then realized that I don't know what the display should look like for all the etymology templates. What are you proposing? —*i̯óh₁n̥C[5] 07:23, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Good question. "🇨🇬 (/*čiçafarnah/)" would look really weird, so no. "🇨🇬 /*čiçafarnah/" would be slightly better, but not by much... Maybe I'd best take this to the Beer Parlour?
 * Another thing: I notice the same behaviour with  ~ tr. Do we want to fix that? I guess not; if anything, it should throw a module error, as I can't imagine any case where we'd have a transliteration but not the original script... Or could there be such cases? --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 10:27, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * *shrug* —*i̯óh₁n̥C[5] 11:32, 29 April 2018 (UTC)