Talk:κόρυλος

RFV discussion: June 2021–February 2022
For the absolute life of me, I can't find any actual attestation for this word beyond lexicographers referencing it in the context of Latin. It seems like this word is actually a reconstruction built on the basis of the Latin. -- 19:13, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, to note, the authors quotes are requested from contain, in the case of Aristotle, /, whence a derivative still being a bird-name  or , , el was later formed, causing manuscripts to contain , , in a treatment of birds where it absolutely can’t mean hazel, and in the case of  a variant spelling of an obscure toponym. Where else anyone puts this word unstarred it is because starring imagined forms was not widespread till the end of the 19th century.
 * And a presence in the reconstruction realm is without grounds too: The spelling of indicates nothing about Greek origin of the word. As the example of  shows, there are folk-etymological spellings even in the Classical standard of Latin. Delete. Fay Freak (talk) 01:45, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

RFV-failed. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 20:07, 24 February 2022 (UTC)