Talk:πάσχω

Etymology
A root of the type **kʷendʰ- violates PIE root constraints. Beekes instead lists *bʰendʰ-, which makes better sense under Grassman's law. Anglom (talk) 15:42, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I assume you mean the constraint described in the second paragraph at Proto-Indo-European root? --WikiTiki89 15:47, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
 * It is indeed. Thank you for linking it. Anglom (talk) 15:51, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Pinging as the one who  and  as the one who . --WikiTiki89 16:01, 23 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Our etymology lists a as a cognate, but Matasović, while also giving the root form as, gives the Lithuanian cognate as . If  is right, then couldn't the root have been ? That would explain the voiceless t of Lithuanian as well as the aspirated θ of Greek while still obeying PIE root constraints, right? I don't know very much about Lithuanian historical phonology. —Mahāgaja · talk 07:58, 6 April 2020 (UTC)