Talk:πρέπω

RFC discussion: January 2020–December 2021
"There is no PoS here, the verb form does not exist". Should the entry even exist? DTLHS (talk) 23:52, 12 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Having suffices IMO.  --Lambiam 08:57, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * , some Modern.Greek dictionaries have a lemma «πρέπω» as well as 3rd-person «πρέπει» (as DSMG, others have only the 3rd person.  The 3rd.person means: must. The modern πρέπω means: I am worthy of but it is not used in 1st person except in a surrealistic phrase where 'disgrace' would speak and say: I am not suited for him: «Δεν του πρέπω» which does not occur. Since a page exists for the verb, i thought I would add a comment, as I usually follow the DSMG style.  Of course, you may erase it. sarri.greek (talk) 11:57, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Usually, when no lemma form is attested (like e.g. for ), we do not create an entry for a reconstructed lemma form (such as *χρῶ), however plausible. However, this is not a hard rule; we do list, although this (infinitive) form is absent in modern Turkish. --Lambiam 17:05, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

RFC-resolved by deleting the whole article. --Fytcha (talk) 19:13, 13 December 2021 (UTC)