Talk:батько

Hi. Could you help adding declension tables for both ба́тько and батько́ for a Russian section as in ru:wikt, please? --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 03:35, 28 August 2016 (UTC)


 * They would be:


 * --WikiTiki89 03:47, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I'll make the entry later, if nobody does.--Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 04:05, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I think they should rather be as follows, at least if we believe the genders of ruwikt:


 * Note that the first one disagrees in the accusatives vis-a-vis ruwikt, but Zaliznyak is clear (p. 54) that masculine animates in -о take acc sg. -а (= gen sg); furthermore, all animates (including neuter animates) take acc pl = gen pl. The ruwikt accent-pattern-a declension would be correct if ба́тько were neuter inanimate.
 * When combined (which is what we'd normally do), the declension would be as follows:

Benwing2 (talk) 04:10, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Pinging various people. Cinemantique, if you agree with my analysis above, you should fix the relevant templates. Benwing2 (talk) 04:11, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, very thorough. Yes, I agree, ru:wiki entry needs to be fixed as well.--Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 04:13, 28 August 2016 (UTC)


 * (e/c) Yes, you're right. I was concetrating on getting the correct plurals and totally forgot about the animacy and did not check the accusatives. Also, I prefer including the asterisk even in the second form, just for consistency even though it makes no difference. --WikiTiki89 04:15, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I've fixed it. Thanks!--Cinemantique (talk) 04:39, 28 August 2016 (UTC)