Talk:блеать

RFD discussion: November 2020–December 2021
This is an eye dialect of. There are various way to distort a vulgar word, so that it's not caught by moderators or special software. Compare with with the English "fcuking" or similar. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 22:23, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
 * So this is Russian for ? I'd say take it to RFV; if it's as well attested as its English equivalent, it should be kept. —Mahāgaja · talk 13:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * No. It is like English . Not actually pronounced like written. The given pronunciation is somewhat ficticious, as not reaching token level though possible in instances, as the vowels are not stretched that distinctly as is done in ; one can of course stretch the vowel when exclaiming, as with many interjections, but this does not make a different word here. It is similar to excluded-from-inclusion repetitions like , . Delete. I also invite  to revise his keep vote. There must be some limits. Fay Freak (talk) 13:17, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * It's more like what Fay Freak said. It's not a spelling pronunciation. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 23:15, 20 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep -- Dentonius 08:31, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * send to RFV -- Dentonius 13:37, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Then again, Keep &mdash; Dentonius 08:06, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Ignoring Dentonius's vote. Not qualified. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 23:15, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * How am I not qualified? &mdash; Dentonius 23:53, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * You're totally ignoring any principles of what we should include defined in WT:CFI, judging by all your votes and posts in the past regarding the term inclusion. Idiomaticity is the main principle and you don't seem to understand or support it. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 23:59, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Why don't you admins delete things right away if they clearly violate the CFI? Why send them here? &mdash; Dentonius 00:15, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * It has nothing to do with Wiktionary administration and is not a clear case, otherwise it could be deleted on sight. Editors are supposed to responsibly assess if a term meets CFI and why. You may think I am picking on you but I am not the only one who thinks that you're not acting responsibly on this page - you may want to check how others reacted to your votes without any thoroughness. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 00:31, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * To me it feels like people here just want a rubber stamp: SOP, wait four weeks, delete. &mdash; Dentonius 00:36, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * A rubber stamp that says "keep" is no better than one that says "delete". Every single one of the deletionists you call "destroyers" has voted "keep" (not to mention "delete" on their own entries), and even the most diehard inclusionist has voted "delete"- except for you, of course. That's because they're reading the arguments and giving their opinions, rather than trying to implement a strategy. Chuck Entz (talk) 00:52, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Chuck, there are always three choices: keep, delete, abstain. I choose to exercise two of them. One entry above, "winterse bui" is going to get deleted. I could go vote delete on it, but I won't. I don't need to. &mdash; Dentonius 01:04, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Deleted. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 09:27, 30 December 2021 (UTC)