Talk:бременен

A note in this article is needful, which would explain that the masculine form is theoretically inconceivable. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 14:36, 10 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Is it really inconceivable? Is there no word for a woman or girl which is grammatically masculine? (see e.g. Icelandic kvenmaður:, Old English ) Even if there is no such word for a female specifically, there could also be words which can describe persons of either sex; general words meaning „human“ or a type of animal, descriptive words like fool, poor thing, etc., e.g. Icelandic ræfill:, which can equally signify a woman, even appearing in combinations such as undefined:. Are there no such possible instances in Bulgarian? – Krun 15:15, 10 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Also consider the seahorse and pipefish, in which the females lay their eggs in the males, who then become pregnant. PierreAbbat 15:20, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, your knowledge in biology undoubtedly exceeds mine (if seefish males can become prægnant), so I should probaly retract my proposal. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 16:37, 10 August 2009 (UTC)