Talk:згра

Can you help with this? I'm sure the genitive plural is not as given. Maybe we should mark it as nonexistent. There's a source cited for this word; see p. 26, maybe you can read it and see what it says. Benwing2 (talk) 05:13, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, it's another dictionary-only word, like олово́к. V. Dal used it but put a question mark on it. The word won't pass CFI. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 05:27, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

RFV discussion: August 2020–May 2023
Per User:Atitarev, a dictionary-only word found in Dal with a ? by it. Benwing2 (talk) 05:29, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * @Benwing2: The entry in 's (in that time "Great Russian"=Russian, as opposed to Ukrainian or Belarusian) dictionary looks like this:
 * ЗГРА? донск. искра (зга?).
 * Question marks are preserved. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 05:42, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * @Benwing2: I've added reference to Dahl. If it's kept, the inlfections should be removed as unknown. exists in modern Russian but preserved only in expressions. Also diminutive . --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 06:13, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

I dont get it .... why arent we just assuming the etymology is that it's a variant of искра? thanks, — Soap — 23:26, 7 August 2020 (UTC)


 * RFV failed. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 17:55, 22 May 2023 (UTC)