Talk:зевачный

RFD discussion: October–November 2018
Junky term created by KoreanQuoter. Doesn't exist in any dictionaries or books. Benwing2 (talk) 02:42, 30 October 2018 (UTC)


 * I don't think I've ever heard it before, but I understand it. If it exists, it's the adjective of, something like yawning, gaping. Maybe Anatolii knows of it. —Stephen (Talk) 04:35, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * : It can be deleted. Theoretically, it can exist, but it's not used. BTW, it's nominated for deletion in ruwikt as well. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 05:50, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I marked it for deletion on ruwikt. The Russian admins there have not seen it yet. —Stephen (Talk) 06:34, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * It has since been deleted there. --Lambiam 10:58, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 * This is clearly not a word, it should have been speedy deleted. Guldrelokk (talk) 19:01, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Deleted. Benwing2 (talk) 15:11, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
 * @Benwing2: Can you please clarify how this deletion fits our RFV vs. RFD distinction? What is the RFD-relevant deletion rationale? --Dan Polansky (talk) 15:16, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Apologies, this probably should have been put under RFV. No citations that I could find anywhere. Benwing2 (talk) 15:23, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
 * All right. Let's assume that it would fail RFV (WT:ATTEST) since you could not find any attesting quotations, then. However, it would be preferable that RFV gets used for similar cases rather than opinions being requested in RFD. --Dan Polansky (talk) 16:15, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Zero hits apart from the dictionaries cloning Wiktionary. For a language like Russian, a hence assumes it is fake. There are lots of fake words entered by users and deleted instantly. There is no rule either how long a RFV stays. Just imagine the verification process has been very short, so short it has not even been entered onto the RFV page. Fay Freak (talk) 15:33, 10 November 2018 (UTC)