Talk:ложить

In what way is this word proscribed? If it's just gutter language, it shouldn't take the proscribed tag, which is meant to indicate that authorities consider the entry a semantic, orthographic or grammatical error. Korn &#91;kʰũːɘ̃n&#93; (talk) 18:59, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi. Entry talk pages are not the best place to discuss. If you're not pinging anyone, you're talking to no-one in particular. :) Do you really want to know or you're just looking for a reason to remove the label? ;) --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 21:16, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I assume that the relevant people have the page on watchlist, it's what the discussion pages are for, innit? I don't see a reason to assume some hidden ulterior motive, tovarišč, have I ever given you one! I saw it in the vote and was curious to see what Russians proscribe against. Now I'm just wondering, since my impression is that a faulty use of label is possible here. Would that be the case, I would indeed want it removed, just like every Wiktionarian would want our tools to be used correctly, as I would hope. Korn &#91;kʰũːɘ̃n&#93; (talk) 21:21, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I see. I didn't mean to offend you and therefore put a few smiles. Sorry, the joke didn't work. No, you haven't given me any reason. IMO, the label is totally justified but it requires more time to explain Pls raise it in the Tea room, I will get back to it when I have more time or someone else will.--Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 21:26, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * As you wish. And don't worry, I know you bear that upright decency I associate with Russians and would never assume that you mean something badly. Korn &#91;kʰũːɘ̃n&#93; (talk) 21:38, 22 November 2016 (UTC)