Talk:одинокий

The suffix is probably, also found in. Per utramque cavernam 14:25, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * The examples given at include also широ́кий which has . Theoretically we could form  with such a suffix. I am not sure if -о́кий and -кий should be distinguished in Russian, but the former might not be productive in Russian (as distinguished from Proto-Slavic) though and thus perhaps should not assumed at all, but then широ́кий should be kicked from the  page as not being formed in Russian but before Russian. This poses the question from which century the word одино́кий is. I am now not informed about the productivity of  in Russian and Old Russian from Proto-Slavic.  Fay Freak (talk) 14:46, 13 January 2019 (UTC)