Talk:победоносец

In this case, Z has secondary stress on побѐдо-. Ruwikt does not, and Ivanova doesn't have secondary stress in the related word победоно́сный, so I suspect Z may be in error. Benwing2 (talk) 03:28, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * : I think we can make it optional and the one with the 2-ary stress is more common, IMO. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 03:36, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * : Do you mean this page? Actually, Zaliznyak's dictionary doesn't have победоносец. I think there's no secondary stress.--Cinemantique (talk) 04:48, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, that page. I thought that page is based on a newer version of Zaliznyak. I think it was you who pointed me to that site. Benwing2 (talk) 04:51, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, unfortunately, that site has mistakes sometimes. The newer version of Zaliznyak doesn't have победоносец.--Cinemantique (talk) 05:00, 8 April 2018 (UTC)