Talk:посꙑлати

Alternative forms or different aspects?
Hi. Could it be the case that is imperfective and  is perfective, just like Russian cognates/derivations  and ? We don't even have such categories for Old church Slavonic but they most likely had this feature. Cf. (imperfective?) and (perfective?). --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 10:45, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Different aspects. I was about to correct it. Безименен (talk) 10:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks. would work but  doesn't support aspects yet. More work needs to be done for OCS. It can be requested on WT:GP. I have just edited  so that you can use a for display only but it doesn't categorise. The Belarusian aspects are added by the conjugations tables. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 11:34, 11 May 2020 (UTC)