Talk:по этому

RFD discussion: November 2013–April 2014
Sum of parts, even though it's a homophone of. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 01:27, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Same as above. --WikiTiki89 01:38, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Why doesn't WT:COALMINE apply? What's good for the goose is good for the gander. DCDuring TALK 15:27, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 * They mean different things. The one-word version has a more-or-less idiomatic meaning, while the two-word version is completely SOP. --WikiTiki89 15:53, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Are you sure that does not mean  often enough to be attestable? This seems suspiciously close to therefor, therefore. DCDuring TALK  21:03, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 * never means, but could be a non-standard or dated spelling of . I suppose we could replace the definition with a  sense and a  sense. --WikiTiki89 21:22, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, yes, it's a complete SoP, unless we have special CFI for homophone collocations (e.g. [[upon]] = [[up]] [[on]] or similar). If "по этому" is ever used a non-standard of "поэтому", then it's very rare and illiterate. No, it's not a dated form. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 02:33, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Deleted. bd2412 T 03:35, 27 April 2014 (UTC)