Talk:сукка

Presumably gem=n is required? Benwing2 (talk) 11:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I think so, but then again, I tend to lean toward not geminating in places where it is optional, so I'm not a good source on where it is potentially optional. And I doubt the other two have ever heard this word or that it would appear in Avanesov's orthoepic dictionary (although maybe). --WikiTiki89 16:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Optional. I would geminate the word in both stress patterns, especially to distinguish it from сука.--Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 19:53, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * OK. I made су́кка have optional gemination. If you think that сукка́ should also have optional gemination, you can change it. Benwing2 (talk) 23:40, 9 November 2015 (UTC)