Talk:черес-

Anatoli et al., can you check these terms and defns as well? Note that for some of them I couldn't even guess. Benwing2 (talk) 04:45, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I have improved a bit. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 05:06, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Why does this exist parallely and not as a soft-redirect to with the example here placed rather thither, since it is only an allomorph? This issue is even more ardent with Turkic languages, see . We have solved the issue of splitting up multiple uses of a morph as you can see on Category:Latin words suffixed with -o so we should on the other hand solve the matter of a morpheme having multiple morphs somehow having all on one place. Fay Freak (talk) 21:32, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The situation with Russian alt forms is not so bad, we can do with just alt forms. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 22:27, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * This is just how we've done things, and as Anatoli mentions, there are only one or two alt forms at worst, so it doesn't much matter. It also agrees with how Russian dictionaries tend to do things, e.g. there are separate entries for через... and черес... in Ozhegov. Benwing2 (talk) 17:30, 3 December 2018 (UTC)